Publisher’s Note: Why I say NO to CCS Levy

By Ronda Watson Barber
OhioMBE Publisher

I’m often asked why I don’t support the Columbus City School Tax Levy. The answer is straightforward: the district has consistently failed to meet its own standards, particularly in the area of equity.

Firstly, let’s talk about the district’s financial commitments to Black vendors. Despite a mandate to allocate at least 20% of its purchases to certified LEDE vendors, Columbus City Schools (CCS) spent only $8 million out of $332 million with Black vendors last year. This is particularly concerning given that the district predominantly serves Black students. The LEDE program, which should be an affirmative action initiative, seems to disproportionately benefit white vendors instead.

Secondly, the Operations division lacks competent and respectful professionals. Despite promises from the new superintendent and board president to appoint a new COO, Maurice Oldham remains in charge. This division is responsible for student transportation and maintaining clean, safe buildings—tasks at which they have repeatedly failed. The status quo remains, and that’s not acceptable.

I’ve also filed formal complaints against the Capital Improvements staff for unprofessional conduct. As a Black woman, it’s unacceptable that the director and staff feel they yell at me without repercussions. Moreover, the director has ceased advertising contracting opportunities to Black vendors through OhioMBE, seemingly as a retaliatory measure for my criticisms. This is not only against the district’s supposed equity policy but also speaks volumes about its commitment to Black vendors.

Lastly, CCS’s academic performance is dismal, receiving three Ds and an F on the last state assessment. The community has every right to question why they should financially support a failing system. I see a lot of wasteful spending and question whether the district is being a good steward of taxpayer dollars. The levy seems more like a band-aid for systemic issues than a well-thought-out solution. Tax abatements are harming public education, yet no board member has addressed this issue.

In summary, supporting the tax levy would be an endorsement of a system that has shown itself to be irresponsible and inequitable. It’s time for a change.

Just my thoughts…rwb