By Ronda Watson Barber
OhioMBE Publisher
In a recent development that raises concerns about commitment to diversity and inclusion, leadership at Columbus City Schools (CCS)—including the Superintendent, Chief Operating Officer, and Director of Capital Improvements—has sparked controversy within the Black community and among Black vendors. Their actions, or lack thereof, have not only sent a strong message regarding their stance on purchasing inclusion. They have effectively communicated a blatant “F-you” to the elected board of education, the Black community, and Black vendors.
A so-called “secret” vendor fair organized by Capital Improvements notably excluded the Outreach Coordinator responsible for the LEDE program on President’s Day. This exclusion resulted in a missed opportunity for vendors to connect with prime contractors, undermining efforts to foster a more inclusive procurement process. A select group of vendors were invited. Many vendors are not sure what the criteria for receiving an invitation was. Furthermore, the decision to outsource the organization of the event to a white South Carolina-based company, transferring contractors’ contact information without consent, has added to the grievances.
The local community, including advocacy by the NAACP, has been vocal at board meetings, urging the district to prioritize local purchasing. Such advocacy underscores the logical argument for reinvesting in the local community that supports the district through taxation. Despite these calls to action, CCS’s approach to purchasing reveals a troubling disparity: last school year, white vendors associated with the LEDE program were awarded $18.3 million in contracts, compared to $8.9 million for Black vendors. This disparity is not just a number—it’s a reflection of a deeper issue within the system.
The lack of inclusivity in purchasing decisions, especially in a district with a predominantly Black student population, is inexplicable and unacceptable. The statistics and actions—or inactions—of CCS officials speak volumes about the need for a reassessment of values and priorities to ensure fairness, equity, and community support in their procurement practices. Amidst this, the district and administration continue to disrespect Black vendors yet expect the Black community to financially support it, further highlighting the critical need for change and accountability in CCS’s purchasing policies. Make it make sense.
just my thoughts…rwb
